GLASNEVIN CEMETERY - SESSION ONE IN MAY 2025
GLASNEVIN CEMETERY SESSION 1 SUNDAY 4 MAY 2025]
Glasnevin Cemetery, located in Dublin, is a significant burial ground that opened in 1832. It serves as the final resting place for approximately 1.5 million people, including many prominent figures in Irish history, such as Daniel O'Connell, Michael Collins, and Charles Stewart Parnell.
The cemetery spans a large area and features a variety of monuments and burial styles, reflecting the changing times. Notably, it houses the O'Connell Tower, a prominent landmark. Glasnevin Cemetery also includes a museum that provides insights into the history of the cemetery and the individuals buried there, making it a place of historical and cultural interest.
After giving the matter much consideration I decided to forget about getting the Sony 70-200mm F2.8 GM II lens and purchase the F4 G II version instead, The main reason was weight and price, especially as I got a large discount.
My new Sony 70-200mm F4 G II arrived today so I decided to test it by visiting Glasnevin Cemetery as well as the Botanic Gardens.
Sony FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II vs F2.8 GM OSS II: A Comparative Analysis
Section 1: Introduction
The decision to invest in a high-quality telephoto zoom lens often involves careful consideration, particularly within Sony's E-mount system where multiple excellent options exist. Opting for the Sony FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II over its sibling, the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II, represents a thoughtful choice driven by practical factors such as weight and price, especially when amplified by a favourable discount. This dilemma is common amongst photography enthusiasts navigating the premium G and G Master lens lines, weighing tangible benefits against ultimate performance specifications.
Both the FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II (hereafter referred to as the 'F4 G II') and the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II ('F2.8 GM II') are modern, highly capable lenses representing significant updates to their respective predecessors. They embody Sony's commitment to advancing optical technology, autofocus systems, and handling within the popular 70-200mm focal range, a staple for portrait, event, sports, and landscape photography. The F4 G II belongs to Sony's high-quality 'G' lineup, while the F2.8 GM II sits at the pinnacle as a 'G Master' lens, promising the ultimate in resolution and bokeh.
This discussion aims to provide a comprehensive analysis validating the decision to choose the F4 G II. It will delve into the specific advantages offered by its lower weight and cost, synthesise findings from expert technical reviews comparing its performance to the F2.8 GM II, collate perspectives from online photography communities discussing real-world use cases, and offer a detailed investigation into the F4 G II's unique and highly regarded half-macro capabilities. The objective is to present a balanced view that ultimately supports the rationale behind selecting the F4 G II based on the stated priorities of weight and price.
Section 2: Weight and Cost: The Tangible Advantages of the F4 G II
The choice between the F4 G II and the F2.8 GM II often hinges significantly on two very practical considerations: how much the lens weighs and how much it costs. For many photographers, particularly those who travel, hike, or shoot for extended periods, these factors can be just as important as the maximum aperture.
The Portability Factor: A Significant Difference
One of the most compelling arguments for the F4 G II is its significantly reduced weight and more compact dimensions compared to the F2.8 GM II. The F4 G II weighs in at a mere 794 grams (without its tripod collar), whereas the F2.8 GM II tips the scales at 1045 grams. This difference of 251 grams represents nearly a 25% weight saving, a figure that is immediately noticeable in the hand and in the camera bag. While the F2.8 GM II was itself praised for being substantially lighter than its own predecessor , the F4 G II takes portability a step further, making it one of the lightest options in its class.
Beyond weight, the physical size also differs significantly due to their respective zoom mechanisms. The F4 G II employs an external zoom design, meaning the barrel extends as you zoom towards 200mm. However, when retracted to 70mm, the lens measures only 149mm in length. In contrast, the F2.8 GM II features an internal zoom, maintaining a constant length of 200mm regardless of the focal length selected. This shorter retracted length of the F4 G II is frequently cited by users and reviewers as a major advantage for packing, allowing it to fit more easily into camera bags, sometimes even while mounted on the camera body.
This reduction in weight and size is not merely a specification on paper; it translates directly into a more comfortable and practical user experience. Reviewers and users consistently report that the F4 G II feels better balanced, particularly on the typically smaller bodies of Sony's Alpha mirrorless cameras, reducing fatigue during long shooting sessions or demanding hikes. This improved handling makes it an ideal companion for travel photography, run-and-gun videography, or any scenario where minimising bulk is a priority. A lens that is physically easier to carry and manage is often the lens that gets used most often, potentially increasing its overall value to the photographer beyond its optical merits alone. The decision to prioritise these physical characteristics is therefore a perfectly valid approach to lens selection.
The Value Proposition: Performance Meets Affordability
The second major practical advantage of the F4 G II lies in its price. Typically retailing for around £1750 or $1700, it sits significantly below the F2.8 GM II, which commands a price closer to £2600 or $2800. This difference of approximately £850 or $1100 makes the F4 G II a considerably more accessible option for photographers seeking Sony's high-quality telephoto zoom performance. Obtaining the lens with an additional discount, as in the user's case, further solidifies its strong value proposition.
While the F2.8 aperture of the GM II undoubtedly offers benefits – primarily gathering twice as much light for low-light situations and enabling a shallower depth of field for maximum subject isolation – the F4 maximum aperture of the G II is often entirely sufficient for a wide range of photographic applications. For travel, landscape, daytime events, or well-lit sports, the F4 aperture provides ample light and creative control. Furthermore, the impressive high-ISO performance of modern Sony camera bodies can effectively compensate for the one-stop difference in light gathering in many scenarios.
Therefore, the F4 G II can be seen as offering a substantial portion of the performance and cutting-edge features found in its G Master counterpart, but at a significantly reduced financial investment. It incorporates advanced technologies like the XD linear focus motors and high-quality optical elements, delivering results that, as discussed later, often come remarkably close to the GM II. User discussions frequently revolve around this cost-benefit analysis, weighing the advantages of the F2.8 aperture against the considerable cost savings offered by the F4 G II. This lens effectively democratises access to Sony's latest telephoto zoom innovations, providing near-premium performance without the full premium price tag, making it a high-value choice rather than simply a 'budget' alternative.
Section 3: Expert Analysis: Performance Compared
While weight and cost are compelling practical advantages, a thorough comparison must also delve into the performance characteristics of both lenses, drawing upon detailed expert reviews and technical analyses.
Optical Prowess: A Closer Look at Image Quality
Both the F4 G II and F2.8 GM II are lauded by reviewers for delivering exceptional image quality, showcasing Sony's optical expertise.
Sharpness: Both lenses achieve very high levels of sharpness across their zoom ranges. Technical tests and reviews often indicate that the F2.8 GM II maintains a slight advantage, particularly in the extreme corners of the frame when shot wide open at f/2.8, or towards the 200mm end of the zoom range. However, the F4 G II is consistently praised for its own impressive sharpness, performing admirably even on high-resolution sensors. Many reviewers and users note that in real-world shooting scenarios, or when both lenses are stopped down to common apertures like f/5.6 or f/8 (often used for landscapes or group portraits), the sharpness difference becomes negligible or practically invisible.
Bokeh and Rendering: The quality of the out-of-focus areas (bokeh) is often a key differentiator for premium lenses. The F2.8 GM II, benefiting from its wider f/2.8 maximum aperture and an 11-bladed rounded diaphragm, typically produces exceptionally smooth, creamy bokeh with excellent subject separation from the background. It is praised for rendering defocused highlights cleanly, free from distracting 'onion ring' patterns or harsh edges. The F4 G II, equipped with a 9-bladed rounded diaphragm, also delivers pleasing bokeh, particularly noticeable at the 200mm focal length or when focusing closely. However, compared to the GM II, its bokeh might exhibit slightly more defined edges on highlights or show more pronounced 'cat-eye' shapes towards the corners of the frame. One review noted subtle onion ring patterns in the F4 G II's bokeh under certain conditions.
Aberrations, Distortion, Flare: Both lenses demonstrate excellent control over chromatic aberrations, minimising colour fringing both laterally (LaCA, often seen as blue/yellow fringing on high-contrast edges) and longitudinally (LoCA, purple/green fringing in out-of-focus areas). This is crucial as LoCA, in particular, can be difficult to correct in post-processing. In terms of geometric distortion, the F4 G II tends to show more noticeable pincushion distortion (where straight lines bow inwards) towards the 200mm end in uncorrected RAW files compared to the F2.8 GM II. However, modern software and in-camera corrections effectively mitigate this for most users. Flare control is generally very good on both lenses, thanks to Sony's advanced coatings (including Nano AR Coating II on the GM II), though shooting directly into bright light sources can still induce some flare or ghosting. The GM II might hold a slight advantage here due to its more advanced coating technology.
Ultimately, while meticulous testing reveals measurable optical advantages for the F2.8 GM II, particularly regarding corner sharpness wide open and the ultimate smoothness of its bokeh, the F4 G II performs at such a high level across the board that these differences may not translate into significantly better images for many photographers in typical use. The F4 G II's overall image quality is frequently described as excellent, often exceeding expectations for an f/4 zoom and proving more than capable for demanding applications. For users prioritising the F4 G II's other benefits (weight, size, cost, macro), its optical output is unlikely to be a limiting factor.
Autofocus Capabilities: Speed and Precision
In terms of autofocus, both the F4 G II and F2.8 GM II represent the pinnacle of Sony's current technology. Both lenses incorporate four of Sony's high-thrust XD (Extreme Dynamic) Linear Motors – two for each internal focusing group. This advanced motor system delivers exceptionally fast, precise, and quiet autofocus performance.
Reviewers consistently praise both lenses for their ability to acquire focus rapidly and accurately, reliably track moving subjects, and keep pace with the high continuous shooting speeds of cameras like the Sony Alpha 1 (up to 30fps). While Sony markets impressive speed gains for each lens compared to its own predecessor (claiming the GM II is up to 4x faster than the GM I and the F4 G II is 20% faster than the F4 G I ), direct comparisons between the two Mark II versions suggest that both operate at a similarly elite level. Some reviewers subjectively felt the F4 G II's focus acquisition was incredibly quick, perhaps even faster in feel than the GM II , but objectively, both are state-of-the-art.
Both lenses also exhibit well-suppressed focus breathing – the undesirable slight change in focal length that can occur when adjusting focus. This is a significant benefit for videographers seeking smooth focus transitions. The F4 G II achieves this optically and also supports the breathing compensation feature available in newer Sony camera bodies.
Given that both lenses employ the same sophisticated XD Linear Motor technology and receive universally positive feedback regarding their autofocus speed, accuracy, and tracking capabilities, AF performance is unlikely to be a significant deciding factor between them for the vast majority of users. Both lenses deliver professional-level autofocus suitable for the most demanding applications.
Handling and Build: Ergonomics and Features
Beyond optics and autofocus, the physical handling and feature sets of the lenses present some distinct differences that cater to varying user preferences.
Zoom Mechanism: The most apparent difference is the zoom mechanism. The F4 G II's external zoom design allows for its compact 149mm length when retracted but means the barrel extends significantly when zooming to 200mm. This compactness for storage is a key benefit. However, some users express concern about the potential for dust and moisture to be drawn into the lens with the extending barrel, despite weather sealing. Additionally, the extending barrel can feel less 'professional' or more conspicuous during operation compared to an internal zoom design. The F2.8 GM II features an internal zoom mechanism, maintaining its 200mm length throughout the zoom range. This is often preferred for its consistent handling balance and perceived enhanced robustness against the elements.
Aperture Ring: A significant control difference lies in the aperture ring. The F2.8 GM II includes a dedicated physical aperture ring, complete with third-stop markings, an 'A' setting for camera-body control, a click/declick switch for silent video adjustments, and an Iris Lock switch. This feature is highly valued by many photographers, especially hybrid shooters and videographers who appreciate tactile control. The F4 G II notably lacks this physical aperture ring; aperture must be controlled via the camera's command dials.
Build and Controls: Both lenses boast professional-grade construction with extensive weather sealing to protect against dust and moisture. They share a similar suite of external controls, including multiple customisable focus hold buttons positioned for easy access in both horizontal and vertical orientations, AF/MF switches, focus range limiters, and Optical SteadyShot (OSS) stabilisation controls. Both lenses are supplied with removable tripod collars, although these typically require an additional plate for direct Arca-Swiss tripod compatibility. The filter thread sizes differ, requiring different sets of filters: 72mm for the F4 G II and 77mm for the F2.8 GM II.
These handling characteristics – the way the lens zooms, the presence or absence of an aperture ring – are not minor details. They represent fundamental ergonomic choices that directly impact how a photographer interacts with the lens during shooting. For some users, a strong preference for internal zoom consistency or the tactile feedback of an aperture ring might outweigh subtle differences in optical performance, making these handling aspects critical factors in their decision-making process.
Section 4: Community Perspectives: Online Discussions and Real-World Use
Insights from online photography forums like Reddit's r/SonyAlpha and FredMiranda provide valuable real-world context, reflecting how enthusiasts and professionals weigh the pros and cons of these lenses based on their own shooting styles and priorities.
Travel and Portability: The F4 G II's reduced weight and compact retracted size are consistently lauded in community discussions as game-changers for travel and portability. Users frequently share anecdotes about choosing the F4 G II specifically for hiking trips, international travel, or simply as a more manageable walk-around telephoto option. The ease of packing the shorter lens, sometimes without detaching it from the camera, is a recurring theme.
Image Quality Satisfaction: While acknowledging the F2.8 GM II's ultimate optical prowess, many F4 G II owners express high satisfaction with its image quality. Descriptions like "special" or "excites me every time" appear, suggesting the lens delivers engaging results. Users often find the sharpness excellent and the differences compared to the GM II negligible for their practical needs, even when using high-resolution camera bodies. However, some discussions do note the GM II's perceptible edge in sharpness when pixel-peeping or shooting demanding subjects like landscapes at specific apertures like f/8.
Macro Utility: The integrated macro capability of the F4 G II generates significant positive discussion. Users see it as a major bonus, adding substantial versatility that distinguishes it from typical telephoto zooms. For nature and travel photographers, the ability to capture both distant scenes and detailed close-ups without changing lenses is highly appealing, potentially replacing the need to carry a dedicated macro lens.
The F2.8 Appeal: Despite the F4 G II's strengths, the F2.8 GM II retains a strong following. Users choose or aspire to the GM II for several key reasons: the undeniable advantage of the f/2.8 aperture for low-light work (e.g., indoor sports, dimly lit events) and achieving the shallowest possible depth of field for portraiture; a preference for the handling characteristics of the internal zoom mechanism; the perceived 'professional' build and status associated with the G Master line; and sometimes, simply the desire to own the technically superior option, even if the practical benefits are marginal for their specific use case.
Third-Party Comparisons: Particularly when discussing the F4 G II due to its price point relative to the F2.8 GM II, comparisons with third-party lenses like the Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 Di III VXD inevitably arise. Users acknowledge the Tamron's compelling value proposition: offering an f/2.8 aperture in a compact size at a significantly lower cost. However, they also note the trade-offs, primarily the Tamron's lack of built-in Optical SteadyShot (OSS), incompatibility with Sony's teleconverters (unlike both Sony Mark II lenses), slightly shorter reach (180mm vs 200mm), and potentially differences in autofocus consistency or build quality compared to the Sony G lens. The choice often comes down to whether the user prioritises the f/2.8 aperture and lower cost (Tamron) or the OSS, teleconverter compatibility, full 200mm reach, and native Sony integration of the F4 G II.
These community discussions paint a clear picture of user segmentation. The F4 G II resonates strongly with photographers who place a high premium on portability, versatility (especially the unique macro function), and value, finding its performance more than sufficient for their needs. Conversely, the F2.8 GM II remains the preferred choice for those who require the maximum light-gathering ability and shallowest depth of field offered by the f/2.8 aperture, favour its internal zoom handling, or simply prioritise owning the flagship G Master option, accepting the associated higher cost and weight. Both choices are validated within the community, depending entirely on the individual photographer's priorities and budget.
Section 5: Macro Focus: A Closer Look at the F4 G II's Unique Ability
Perhaps the most defining characteristic that sets the FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II apart from its F2.8 GM II sibling, and indeed from most other telephoto zooms on the market, is its remarkable close-focusing and macro capability.
Half-Macro Capability
The standout specification is the lens's ability to achieve a maximum magnification ratio of 0.5x, equivalent to 1:2 life-size reproduction, across its entire 70mm to 200mm zoom range. This is a world-first feature for a zoom lens of this type at the time of its release. Practically, 0.5x magnification means that an object measuring 72mm across in real life would fill the horizontal width of a full-frame sensor (36mm). This level of magnification allows for genuinely detailed close-up photography. It represents a dramatic improvement over the F2.8 GM II's respectable but significantly lower 0.3x maximum magnification and vastly surpasses the original FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS lens, which only offered a meagre 0.13x magnification.
Minimum Focusing Distance (MFD) and Working Distance
This impressive magnification is achieved through exceptionally short minimum focusing distances (MFD). At the 70mm end, the F4 G II can focus as close as 0.26 metres (approximately 10.2 inches), and at the 200mm end, the MFD is 0.42 metres (approximately 16.5 inches). It is important to understand the difference between MFD (measured from the sensor plane) and working distance (measured from the front of the lens to the subject). At 70mm, the working distance is very short, less than 10cm, which might be challenging for lighting or photographing skittish subjects. However, at 200mm, the working distance increases to a more practical ~20cm (around 8 inches), providing more space between the lens and the subject.
Versatility Added
This integrated macro function fundamentally transforms the F4 G II from a conventional telephoto zoom into a far more versatile tool. It allows photographers to seamlessly capture distant landscapes, portraits, or events, and then immediately zoom in or move closer to capture intricate details of flowers, insects, textures, food, or small products, all without needing to switch lenses or attach accessories like extension tubes. Reviewers consistently highlight this added flexibility as a major advantage, particularly for travel, nature, and walk-around photography where carrying multiple specialised lenses might be impractical.
Performance in Macro
Crucially, the lens maintains strong performance even when focusing closely. Reviewers report excellent sharpness and image quality in macro shots. The fast and accurate XD linear autofocus motors continue to perform well, even enabling tracking autofocus on macro subjects, which is not always the case with macro lenses. The built-in Optical SteadyShot (OSS) image stabilisation is also particularly beneficial for achieving sharp handheld macro images, helping to counteract the amplified effects of camera shake at high magnifications.
Teleconverter Synergy
Further enhancing its versatility, the F4 G II is fully compatible with Sony's 1.4x (SEL14TC) and 2x (SEL20TC) teleconverters – a capability notably absent in its predecessor, the original F4 G OSS. This compatibility not only extends the telephoto reach (to 98-280mm f/5.6 with the 1.4x TC, and 140-400mm f/8 with the 2x TC) but also boosts the macro magnification. Attaching the 1.4x teleconverter increases the maximum magnification to approximately 0.7x. Impressively, adding the 2x teleconverter allows the lens to achieve true 1:1 life-size macro reproduction. This effectively creates a unique 140-400mm f/8 1:1 macro zoom lens, offering unprecedented flexibility for close-up work at various working distances.
The integration of high-performance 0.5x macro capability across the entire zoom range, coupled with teleconverter compatibility for true 1:1 macro, elevates the F4 G II beyond simply being a lighter and more affordable alternative to the F2.8 GM II. It becomes a distinct photographic tool offering a unique blend of telephoto reach and serious close-up performance. This intrinsic versatility makes it an exceptionally compelling option, particularly for photographers involved in travel, nature, or any field where the ability to capture both the grand scale and the minute detail with a single, high-quality lens is advantageous.
Section 6: Conclusion
Based on the analysis of expert reviews, community discussions, and technical specifications, the decision to purchase the Sony FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II, prioritising weight and price, is a well-reasoned and highly justifiable choice. This conclusion is strongly supported by evidence highlighting the lens's specific strengths relative to these priorities and its overall competence.
The F4 G II presents a compelling package for the enthusiast photographer. Its key advantages align perfectly with the stated decision drivers:
Portability: The significant reduction in weight (251g lighter than the GM II) and its shorter retracted length (due to the external zoom) make it markedly easier to carry, handle (especially on smaller bodies), and pack for travel or extended use.
Value: Offering a substantial cost saving compared to the F2.8 GM II, the F4 G II provides access to Sony's advanced lens technology – including excellent optics and rapid XD linear motor autofocus – at a more accessible price point.
Versatility: The standout 0.5x macro capability across the entire zoom range, further enhanced by teleconverter compatibility for 1:1 macro, adds a layer of functionality absent in the F2.8 GM II and most competitors, potentially replacing the need for a separate macro lens.
Performance: Despite the f/4 aperture, the lens delivers excellent sharpness, well-controlled aberrations, pleasing bokeh, and autofocus performance that rivals its G Master sibling in most practical shooting scenarios.
While the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II remains the flagship option, offering the benefits of a wider f/2.8 aperture (crucial for specific low-light situations or achieving maximum background blur), potentially superior optical performance in edge cases, and preferred handling features like internal zoom and a physical aperture ring, these advantages come at the cost of increased weight, size, and price.
Ultimately, the Sony FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II should not be viewed merely as a compromise or a 'lesser' alternative. It stands confidently as a distinct, highly accomplished, and uniquely versatile lens in its own right. Its intelligent design choices successfully balance high optical and autofocus performance with significant gains in portability and the groundbreaking addition of integrated half-macro functionality. For the photographer who values a lighter kit, requires flexibility for both distant subjects and close-up details, and seeks strong value without sacrificing core performance, the F4 G II represents an outstanding and well-supported choice within the Sony E-mount system.
Glasnevin Cemetery, located in Dublin, is a significant burial ground that opened in 1832. It serves as the final resting place for approximately 1.5 million people, including many prominent figures in Irish history, such as Daniel O'Connell, Michael Collins, and Charles Stewart Parnell.
The cemetery spans a large area and features a variety of monuments and burial styles, reflecting the changing times. Notably, it houses the O'Connell Tower, a prominent landmark. Glasnevin Cemetery also includes a museum that provides insights into the history of the cemetery and the individuals buried there, making it a place of historical and cultural interest.
After giving the matter much consideration I decided to forget about getting the Sony 70-200mm F2.8 GM II lens and purchase the F4 G II version instead, The main reason was weight and price, especially as I got a large discount.
My new Sony 70-200mm F4 G II arrived today so I decided to test it by visiting Glasnevin Cemetery as well as the Botanic Gardens.
Sony FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II vs F2.8 GM OSS II: A Comparative Analysis
Section 1: Introduction
The decision to invest in a high-quality telephoto zoom lens often involves careful consideration, particularly within Sony's E-mount system where multiple excellent options exist. Opting for the Sony FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II over its sibling, the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II, represents a thoughtful choice driven by practical factors such as weight and price, especially when amplified by a favourable discount. This dilemma is common amongst photography enthusiasts navigating the premium G and G Master lens lines, weighing tangible benefits against ultimate performance specifications.
Both the FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II (hereafter referred to as the 'F4 G II') and the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II ('F2.8 GM II') are modern, highly capable lenses representing significant updates to their respective predecessors. They embody Sony's commitment to advancing optical technology, autofocus systems, and handling within the popular 70-200mm focal range, a staple for portrait, event, sports, and landscape photography. The F4 G II belongs to Sony's high-quality 'G' lineup, while the F2.8 GM II sits at the pinnacle as a 'G Master' lens, promising the ultimate in resolution and bokeh.
This discussion aims to provide a comprehensive analysis validating the decision to choose the F4 G II. It will delve into the specific advantages offered by its lower weight and cost, synthesise findings from expert technical reviews comparing its performance to the F2.8 GM II, collate perspectives from online photography communities discussing real-world use cases, and offer a detailed investigation into the F4 G II's unique and highly regarded half-macro capabilities. The objective is to present a balanced view that ultimately supports the rationale behind selecting the F4 G II based on the stated priorities of weight and price.
Section 2: Weight and Cost: The Tangible Advantages of the F4 G II
The choice between the F4 G II and the F2.8 GM II often hinges significantly on two very practical considerations: how much the lens weighs and how much it costs. For many photographers, particularly those who travel, hike, or shoot for extended periods, these factors can be just as important as the maximum aperture.
The Portability Factor: A Significant Difference
One of the most compelling arguments for the F4 G II is its significantly reduced weight and more compact dimensions compared to the F2.8 GM II. The F4 G II weighs in at a mere 794 grams (without its tripod collar), whereas the F2.8 GM II tips the scales at 1045 grams. This difference of 251 grams represents nearly a 25% weight saving, a figure that is immediately noticeable in the hand and in the camera bag. While the F2.8 GM II was itself praised for being substantially lighter than its own predecessor , the F4 G II takes portability a step further, making it one of the lightest options in its class.
Beyond weight, the physical size also differs significantly due to their respective zoom mechanisms. The F4 G II employs an external zoom design, meaning the barrel extends as you zoom towards 200mm. However, when retracted to 70mm, the lens measures only 149mm in length. In contrast, the F2.8 GM II features an internal zoom, maintaining a constant length of 200mm regardless of the focal length selected. This shorter retracted length of the F4 G II is frequently cited by users and reviewers as a major advantage for packing, allowing it to fit more easily into camera bags, sometimes even while mounted on the camera body.
This reduction in weight and size is not merely a specification on paper; it translates directly into a more comfortable and practical user experience. Reviewers and users consistently report that the F4 G II feels better balanced, particularly on the typically smaller bodies of Sony's Alpha mirrorless cameras, reducing fatigue during long shooting sessions or demanding hikes. This improved handling makes it an ideal companion for travel photography, run-and-gun videography, or any scenario where minimising bulk is a priority. A lens that is physically easier to carry and manage is often the lens that gets used most often, potentially increasing its overall value to the photographer beyond its optical merits alone. The decision to prioritise these physical characteristics is therefore a perfectly valid approach to lens selection.
The Value Proposition: Performance Meets Affordability
The second major practical advantage of the F4 G II lies in its price. Typically retailing for around £1750 or $1700, it sits significantly below the F2.8 GM II, which commands a price closer to £2600 or $2800. This difference of approximately £850 or $1100 makes the F4 G II a considerably more accessible option for photographers seeking Sony's high-quality telephoto zoom performance. Obtaining the lens with an additional discount, as in the user's case, further solidifies its strong value proposition.
While the F2.8 aperture of the GM II undoubtedly offers benefits – primarily gathering twice as much light for low-light situations and enabling a shallower depth of field for maximum subject isolation – the F4 maximum aperture of the G II is often entirely sufficient for a wide range of photographic applications. For travel, landscape, daytime events, or well-lit sports, the F4 aperture provides ample light and creative control. Furthermore, the impressive high-ISO performance of modern Sony camera bodies can effectively compensate for the one-stop difference in light gathering in many scenarios.
Therefore, the F4 G II can be seen as offering a substantial portion of the performance and cutting-edge features found in its G Master counterpart, but at a significantly reduced financial investment. It incorporates advanced technologies like the XD linear focus motors and high-quality optical elements, delivering results that, as discussed later, often come remarkably close to the GM II. User discussions frequently revolve around this cost-benefit analysis, weighing the advantages of the F2.8 aperture against the considerable cost savings offered by the F4 G II. This lens effectively democratises access to Sony's latest telephoto zoom innovations, providing near-premium performance without the full premium price tag, making it a high-value choice rather than simply a 'budget' alternative.
Section 3: Expert Analysis: Performance Compared
While weight and cost are compelling practical advantages, a thorough comparison must also delve into the performance characteristics of both lenses, drawing upon detailed expert reviews and technical analyses.
Optical Prowess: A Closer Look at Image Quality
Both the F4 G II and F2.8 GM II are lauded by reviewers for delivering exceptional image quality, showcasing Sony's optical expertise.
Sharpness: Both lenses achieve very high levels of sharpness across their zoom ranges. Technical tests and reviews often indicate that the F2.8 GM II maintains a slight advantage, particularly in the extreme corners of the frame when shot wide open at f/2.8, or towards the 200mm end of the zoom range. However, the F4 G II is consistently praised for its own impressive sharpness, performing admirably even on high-resolution sensors. Many reviewers and users note that in real-world shooting scenarios, or when both lenses are stopped down to common apertures like f/5.6 or f/8 (often used for landscapes or group portraits), the sharpness difference becomes negligible or practically invisible.
Bokeh and Rendering: The quality of the out-of-focus areas (bokeh) is often a key differentiator for premium lenses. The F2.8 GM II, benefiting from its wider f/2.8 maximum aperture and an 11-bladed rounded diaphragm, typically produces exceptionally smooth, creamy bokeh with excellent subject separation from the background. It is praised for rendering defocused highlights cleanly, free from distracting 'onion ring' patterns or harsh edges. The F4 G II, equipped with a 9-bladed rounded diaphragm, also delivers pleasing bokeh, particularly noticeable at the 200mm focal length or when focusing closely. However, compared to the GM II, its bokeh might exhibit slightly more defined edges on highlights or show more pronounced 'cat-eye' shapes towards the corners of the frame. One review noted subtle onion ring patterns in the F4 G II's bokeh under certain conditions.
Aberrations, Distortion, Flare: Both lenses demonstrate excellent control over chromatic aberrations, minimising colour fringing both laterally (LaCA, often seen as blue/yellow fringing on high-contrast edges) and longitudinally (LoCA, purple/green fringing in out-of-focus areas). This is crucial as LoCA, in particular, can be difficult to correct in post-processing. In terms of geometric distortion, the F4 G II tends to show more noticeable pincushion distortion (where straight lines bow inwards) towards the 200mm end in uncorrected RAW files compared to the F2.8 GM II. However, modern software and in-camera corrections effectively mitigate this for most users. Flare control is generally very good on both lenses, thanks to Sony's advanced coatings (including Nano AR Coating II on the GM II), though shooting directly into bright light sources can still induce some flare or ghosting. The GM II might hold a slight advantage here due to its more advanced coating technology.
Ultimately, while meticulous testing reveals measurable optical advantages for the F2.8 GM II, particularly regarding corner sharpness wide open and the ultimate smoothness of its bokeh, the F4 G II performs at such a high level across the board that these differences may not translate into significantly better images for many photographers in typical use. The F4 G II's overall image quality is frequently described as excellent, often exceeding expectations for an f/4 zoom and proving more than capable for demanding applications. For users prioritising the F4 G II's other benefits (weight, size, cost, macro), its optical output is unlikely to be a limiting factor.
Autofocus Capabilities: Speed and Precision
In terms of autofocus, both the F4 G II and F2.8 GM II represent the pinnacle of Sony's current technology. Both lenses incorporate four of Sony's high-thrust XD (Extreme Dynamic) Linear Motors – two for each internal focusing group. This advanced motor system delivers exceptionally fast, precise, and quiet autofocus performance.
Reviewers consistently praise both lenses for their ability to acquire focus rapidly and accurately, reliably track moving subjects, and keep pace with the high continuous shooting speeds of cameras like the Sony Alpha 1 (up to 30fps). While Sony markets impressive speed gains for each lens compared to its own predecessor (claiming the GM II is up to 4x faster than the GM I and the F4 G II is 20% faster than the F4 G I ), direct comparisons between the two Mark II versions suggest that both operate at a similarly elite level. Some reviewers subjectively felt the F4 G II's focus acquisition was incredibly quick, perhaps even faster in feel than the GM II , but objectively, both are state-of-the-art.
Both lenses also exhibit well-suppressed focus breathing – the undesirable slight change in focal length that can occur when adjusting focus. This is a significant benefit for videographers seeking smooth focus transitions. The F4 G II achieves this optically and also supports the breathing compensation feature available in newer Sony camera bodies.
Given that both lenses employ the same sophisticated XD Linear Motor technology and receive universally positive feedback regarding their autofocus speed, accuracy, and tracking capabilities, AF performance is unlikely to be a significant deciding factor between them for the vast majority of users. Both lenses deliver professional-level autofocus suitable for the most demanding applications.
Handling and Build: Ergonomics and Features
Beyond optics and autofocus, the physical handling and feature sets of the lenses present some distinct differences that cater to varying user preferences.
Zoom Mechanism: The most apparent difference is the zoom mechanism. The F4 G II's external zoom design allows for its compact 149mm length when retracted but means the barrel extends significantly when zooming to 200mm. This compactness for storage is a key benefit. However, some users express concern about the potential for dust and moisture to be drawn into the lens with the extending barrel, despite weather sealing. Additionally, the extending barrel can feel less 'professional' or more conspicuous during operation compared to an internal zoom design. The F2.8 GM II features an internal zoom mechanism, maintaining its 200mm length throughout the zoom range. This is often preferred for its consistent handling balance and perceived enhanced robustness against the elements.
Aperture Ring: A significant control difference lies in the aperture ring. The F2.8 GM II includes a dedicated physical aperture ring, complete with third-stop markings, an 'A' setting for camera-body control, a click/declick switch for silent video adjustments, and an Iris Lock switch. This feature is highly valued by many photographers, especially hybrid shooters and videographers who appreciate tactile control. The F4 G II notably lacks this physical aperture ring; aperture must be controlled via the camera's command dials.
Build and Controls: Both lenses boast professional-grade construction with extensive weather sealing to protect against dust and moisture. They share a similar suite of external controls, including multiple customisable focus hold buttons positioned for easy access in both horizontal and vertical orientations, AF/MF switches, focus range limiters, and Optical SteadyShot (OSS) stabilisation controls. Both lenses are supplied with removable tripod collars, although these typically require an additional plate for direct Arca-Swiss tripod compatibility. The filter thread sizes differ, requiring different sets of filters: 72mm for the F4 G II and 77mm for the F2.8 GM II.
These handling characteristics – the way the lens zooms, the presence or absence of an aperture ring – are not minor details. They represent fundamental ergonomic choices that directly impact how a photographer interacts with the lens during shooting. For some users, a strong preference for internal zoom consistency or the tactile feedback of an aperture ring might outweigh subtle differences in optical performance, making these handling aspects critical factors in their decision-making process.
Section 4: Community Perspectives: Online Discussions and Real-World Use
Insights from online photography forums like Reddit's r/SonyAlpha and FredMiranda provide valuable real-world context, reflecting how enthusiasts and professionals weigh the pros and cons of these lenses based on their own shooting styles and priorities.
Travel and Portability: The F4 G II's reduced weight and compact retracted size are consistently lauded in community discussions as game-changers for travel and portability. Users frequently share anecdotes about choosing the F4 G II specifically for hiking trips, international travel, or simply as a more manageable walk-around telephoto option. The ease of packing the shorter lens, sometimes without detaching it from the camera, is a recurring theme.
Image Quality Satisfaction: While acknowledging the F2.8 GM II's ultimate optical prowess, many F4 G II owners express high satisfaction with its image quality. Descriptions like "special" or "excites me every time" appear, suggesting the lens delivers engaging results. Users often find the sharpness excellent and the differences compared to the GM II negligible for their practical needs, even when using high-resolution camera bodies. However, some discussions do note the GM II's perceptible edge in sharpness when pixel-peeping or shooting demanding subjects like landscapes at specific apertures like f/8.
Macro Utility: The integrated macro capability of the F4 G II generates significant positive discussion. Users see it as a major bonus, adding substantial versatility that distinguishes it from typical telephoto zooms. For nature and travel photographers, the ability to capture both distant scenes and detailed close-ups without changing lenses is highly appealing, potentially replacing the need to carry a dedicated macro lens.
The F2.8 Appeal: Despite the F4 G II's strengths, the F2.8 GM II retains a strong following. Users choose or aspire to the GM II for several key reasons: the undeniable advantage of the f/2.8 aperture for low-light work (e.g., indoor sports, dimly lit events) and achieving the shallowest possible depth of field for portraiture; a preference for the handling characteristics of the internal zoom mechanism; the perceived 'professional' build and status associated with the G Master line; and sometimes, simply the desire to own the technically superior option, even if the practical benefits are marginal for their specific use case.
Third-Party Comparisons: Particularly when discussing the F4 G II due to its price point relative to the F2.8 GM II, comparisons with third-party lenses like the Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 Di III VXD inevitably arise. Users acknowledge the Tamron's compelling value proposition: offering an f/2.8 aperture in a compact size at a significantly lower cost. However, they also note the trade-offs, primarily the Tamron's lack of built-in Optical SteadyShot (OSS), incompatibility with Sony's teleconverters (unlike both Sony Mark II lenses), slightly shorter reach (180mm vs 200mm), and potentially differences in autofocus consistency or build quality compared to the Sony G lens. The choice often comes down to whether the user prioritises the f/2.8 aperture and lower cost (Tamron) or the OSS, teleconverter compatibility, full 200mm reach, and native Sony integration of the F4 G II.
These community discussions paint a clear picture of user segmentation. The F4 G II resonates strongly with photographers who place a high premium on portability, versatility (especially the unique macro function), and value, finding its performance more than sufficient for their needs. Conversely, the F2.8 GM II remains the preferred choice for those who require the maximum light-gathering ability and shallowest depth of field offered by the f/2.8 aperture, favour its internal zoom handling, or simply prioritise owning the flagship G Master option, accepting the associated higher cost and weight. Both choices are validated within the community, depending entirely on the individual photographer's priorities and budget.
Section 5: Macro Focus: A Closer Look at the F4 G II's Unique Ability
Perhaps the most defining characteristic that sets the FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II apart from its F2.8 GM II sibling, and indeed from most other telephoto zooms on the market, is its remarkable close-focusing and macro capability.
Half-Macro Capability
The standout specification is the lens's ability to achieve a maximum magnification ratio of 0.5x, equivalent to 1:2 life-size reproduction, across its entire 70mm to 200mm zoom range. This is a world-first feature for a zoom lens of this type at the time of its release. Practically, 0.5x magnification means that an object measuring 72mm across in real life would fill the horizontal width of a full-frame sensor (36mm). This level of magnification allows for genuinely detailed close-up photography. It represents a dramatic improvement over the F2.8 GM II's respectable but significantly lower 0.3x maximum magnification and vastly surpasses the original FE 70-200mm F4 G OSS lens, which only offered a meagre 0.13x magnification.
Minimum Focusing Distance (MFD) and Working Distance
This impressive magnification is achieved through exceptionally short minimum focusing distances (MFD). At the 70mm end, the F4 G II can focus as close as 0.26 metres (approximately 10.2 inches), and at the 200mm end, the MFD is 0.42 metres (approximately 16.5 inches). It is important to understand the difference between MFD (measured from the sensor plane) and working distance (measured from the front of the lens to the subject). At 70mm, the working distance is very short, less than 10cm, which might be challenging for lighting or photographing skittish subjects. However, at 200mm, the working distance increases to a more practical ~20cm (around 8 inches), providing more space between the lens and the subject.
Versatility Added
This integrated macro function fundamentally transforms the F4 G II from a conventional telephoto zoom into a far more versatile tool. It allows photographers to seamlessly capture distant landscapes, portraits, or events, and then immediately zoom in or move closer to capture intricate details of flowers, insects, textures, food, or small products, all without needing to switch lenses or attach accessories like extension tubes. Reviewers consistently highlight this added flexibility as a major advantage, particularly for travel, nature, and walk-around photography where carrying multiple specialised lenses might be impractical.
Performance in Macro
Crucially, the lens maintains strong performance even when focusing closely. Reviewers report excellent sharpness and image quality in macro shots. The fast and accurate XD linear autofocus motors continue to perform well, even enabling tracking autofocus on macro subjects, which is not always the case with macro lenses. The built-in Optical SteadyShot (OSS) image stabilisation is also particularly beneficial for achieving sharp handheld macro images, helping to counteract the amplified effects of camera shake at high magnifications.
Teleconverter Synergy
Further enhancing its versatility, the F4 G II is fully compatible with Sony's 1.4x (SEL14TC) and 2x (SEL20TC) teleconverters – a capability notably absent in its predecessor, the original F4 G OSS. This compatibility not only extends the telephoto reach (to 98-280mm f/5.6 with the 1.4x TC, and 140-400mm f/8 with the 2x TC) but also boosts the macro magnification. Attaching the 1.4x teleconverter increases the maximum magnification to approximately 0.7x. Impressively, adding the 2x teleconverter allows the lens to achieve true 1:1 life-size macro reproduction. This effectively creates a unique 140-400mm f/8 1:1 macro zoom lens, offering unprecedented flexibility for close-up work at various working distances.
The integration of high-performance 0.5x macro capability across the entire zoom range, coupled with teleconverter compatibility for true 1:1 macro, elevates the F4 G II beyond simply being a lighter and more affordable alternative to the F2.8 GM II. It becomes a distinct photographic tool offering a unique blend of telephoto reach and serious close-up performance. This intrinsic versatility makes it an exceptionally compelling option, particularly for photographers involved in travel, nature, or any field where the ability to capture both the grand scale and the minute detail with a single, high-quality lens is advantageous.
Section 6: Conclusion
Based on the analysis of expert reviews, community discussions, and technical specifications, the decision to purchase the Sony FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II, prioritising weight and price, is a well-reasoned and highly justifiable choice. This conclusion is strongly supported by evidence highlighting the lens's specific strengths relative to these priorities and its overall competence.
The F4 G II presents a compelling package for the enthusiast photographer. Its key advantages align perfectly with the stated decision drivers:
Portability: The significant reduction in weight (251g lighter than the GM II) and its shorter retracted length (due to the external zoom) make it markedly easier to carry, handle (especially on smaller bodies), and pack for travel or extended use.
Value: Offering a substantial cost saving compared to the F2.8 GM II, the F4 G II provides access to Sony's advanced lens technology – including excellent optics and rapid XD linear motor autofocus – at a more accessible price point.
Versatility: The standout 0.5x macro capability across the entire zoom range, further enhanced by teleconverter compatibility for 1:1 macro, adds a layer of functionality absent in the F2.8 GM II and most competitors, potentially replacing the need for a separate macro lens.
Performance: Despite the f/4 aperture, the lens delivers excellent sharpness, well-controlled aberrations, pleasing bokeh, and autofocus performance that rivals its G Master sibling in most practical shooting scenarios.
While the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II remains the flagship option, offering the benefits of a wider f/2.8 aperture (crucial for specific low-light situations or achieving maximum background blur), potentially superior optical performance in edge cases, and preferred handling features like internal zoom and a physical aperture ring, these advantages come at the cost of increased weight, size, and price.
Ultimately, the Sony FE 70-200mm F4 Macro G OSS II should not be viewed merely as a compromise or a 'lesser' alternative. It stands confidently as a distinct, highly accomplished, and uniquely versatile lens in its own right. Its intelligent design choices successfully balance high optical and autofocus performance with significant gains in portability and the groundbreaking addition of integrated half-macro functionality. For the photographer who values a lighter kit, requires flexibility for both distant subjects and close-up details, and seeks strong value without sacrificing core performance, the F4 G II represents an outstanding and well-supported choice within the Sony E-mount system.
GLASNEVIN CEMETERY - SESSION ONE IN MAY 2025